1) The Sedition Act was established in 1798. It was created to control pro-French troublemakers by forbidding criticism of the federal government. The Sedition Act was meant to curb freedom of speech, but the government took it too far. They arrested many people for minor situations. The Sedition Act was never brought before the Supreme Court and in 1801 the Sedition Act was expired. When Jefferson was elected he pardoned all the people that were convicted when Adams and the Sedition Act were in term. After the Sedition Act the government tried many things to regulate freedom of speech, such as the Espionage Act
2) The Sedition Act was unconstitutional and constitutional. The Sedition Act was unconstitutional because went beyond protecting the government because it went against everything that was "'false, scandalous, or malicious"' or against the government. People who did nothing wrong, except speak their minds, were arrested.The Government arrested
2) The Sedition Act was unconstitutional and constitutional. The Sedition Act was unconstitutional because went beyond protecting the government because it went against everything that was "'false, scandalous, or malicious"' or against the government. People who did nothing wrong, except speak their minds, were arrested.The Government arrested
twenty-five citizens under the Sedition Act. One man was found guilty for saying that he wished that a cannon would fire in a salute to President Adams and would hit him in the seat of his pants. It is was constitutional because, some people needed to be stopped, the people who caused danger to the US.
3) The Freedom of Speech is a right granted to American citizens, but many people take advantage of it. The freedom of speech not only deals with a persons choose of word it deals with their actions and the decisions they make while presenting their thoughts, but, right to free speech needs to be limited during wartime and threats against America. If it is not limited people can say what they want such as; hurtful or fighting words, threats, and limiting what people can say to the military.4) The Government might limit freedom of the press or speech during peacetime, so people do not offend military and families of the military. If a military group comes back people could riot and say how they felt about the war, and that could cause, "Clear and present danger" and the government has to stop it before something happens.